HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

Divider

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Advertisements:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

Divider

New Milford Bridge

Veterans Bridge

   


New Milford Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth and Rick McOmber

Bridge Documented: July 13, 2008
View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
US-202 Over Housatonic River
Location
New Milford: Litchfield County, Connecticut
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1953 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
2000
Main Span Length
325 Feet (99.1 Meters)
Structure Length
332 Feet (101.2 Meters)
Roadway Width
30 Feet (9.1 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
901

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge is an example of a metal truss bridge in Connecticut built during the period of state standard plans for bridges. Just like bridges built in the 19th Century had a design and appearance that was associated with the design of a specific bridge company, many bridges built in the 20th Century have a design and appearance instead associated with the design of a specific highway agency and/or state. Connecticut appears to have had a standard design for truss bridges used in the 1930s that was a polygonal Warren through truss with extensive use built-up beams containing lacing. With a 1953 construction date, this bridge is a rather nice looking bridge for its age, and indeed looks more like the bridges built in the 1930s. However it varies from the standard design found in the 1930s Connecticut truss bridges by displaying a Parker truss configuration. Built-up beams with v-lacing and lattice were on their way out in the 1950s, so the fact that this bridge has extensive examples of all those things is unusual. The bridge is also a fairly large length simple span. The bridge carries a large volume of traffic, but remains in decent physical condition. Now might be a good time to begin planning for a rehabilitation of the bridge, while the bridge remains in decent condition. There have also been discussions about the traffic volume on the bridge and the possibility of building an additional bridge to relieve traffic. Strictly from a historic bridge preservation standpoint, providing an additional bridge that would reduce the traffic wear and tear on the historic bridge, thus decreasing maintenance costs and increasing service life, would be beneficial.

Divider

Photos and Videos: New Milford Bridge

Available Photo Galleries and Videos

Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2017, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.