This bridge is a rare Iowa example of a pin-connected camelback truss bridge. The Historic Bridge Inventory remarks that "only a handful" were identified. If so, this bridge is very important on a statewide basis and should receive high preservation priority. The bridge contains an eight panel camelback truss main span with a single steel stringer approach span. The approach span has lattice railings which would appear to be original, while the main span has two angles composing the railing system. The truss is traditionally composed: (up-set eyebars, back-to-back channels with v-lacing), although the v-lacing on the vertical members is positioned parallel to the truss line, which is a less common positioning when compared with surviving trusses from this period on a nationwide scale.
There is impact damage to a vertical member, which was subsequently repaired with welded plate steel. A diagonal member has also been replaced at this same area.
Information and Findings From Iowa's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The Tremaine Bridge spans the Boone River in Independence Township, south of Webster City. Carrying an unpaved county road, the structure consists of a single pin-connected Camelback through truss, supported by steel cylinder piers. The bridge's construction dates from 1902. In April of that year the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors contracted with Des Moines bridge contractor N.M. Stark to supply and build this 160-foot truss. The proposed new structure, which cost $3,600, would replace an existing bridge over the Boone River at this point, built next to Bone's Mill. Using steel rolled in Pittsburgh by Carnegie, Stark erected the truss on timber falseworks near the Tremaine Post Office, completing the bridge later in 1902. The Tremaine Bridge has carried traffic since, with only maintenance-related alterations to its superstructure.
Straight-chorded Pratt through trusses were used extensively throughout Iowa for medium-span crossings in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. For longer crossings after the turn of the century, however, bridge companies could develop greater efficiency with polygonal-chorded Pratt variants, primarily Parker, Pennsylvania and Camelback trusses. With its distinctive five-faceted upper chords, the Camelback configuration was disdained by some engineers (including the redoubtable J.A.L. Waddell, who called it "uncompromisingly ugly") for its tendency under certain conditions to reverse compressive and tensile forces acting on their individual members. As a result, Camelback trusses never received widespread acceptance. Relatively few were ever built on Iowa's roads, and only a handful have been identified as extant by the bridge inventory. The Tremaine Bridge is thus technologically significant as a well-preserved example of this uncommon structural type [adapted from Fraser 1990].
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.|
Mobile Optimized Gallery
|A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2018, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.