HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

Divider

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Advertisements:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

Divider

Hastings Bridge

Hastings High Bridge

   


Hastings Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: June 4, 2013
View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Location
Hastings: Dakota County, Minnesota and Washington County, Minnesota
Structure Type
Metal Continuous (Suspended Deck) Rivet-Connected Warren Through Truss, Fixed and Approach Spans: Metal Stringer (Multi-Beam), Fixed
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1951 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown and Engineer/Design: Sverdrup and Parcel of St. Louis, Missouri

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
514 Feet (156.7 Meters)
Structure Length
1832.3 Feet (558.5 Meters)
Roadway Width
32.2 Feet (9.8 Meters)
Spans
3 Main Span(s) and 10 Approach Span(s)
NBI Number
5895

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

This Bridge No Longer Exists!

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

Demolition of this historic bridge by MNDOT is ongoing!

View The Environmental Assessment For This Historic Bridge

View Historical Articles About This Bridge

Hastings has twice lost a historic bridge. The first time was when an iconic "Spiral Bridge" was demolished when this historic bridge was completed in 1951. The Spiral Bridge was so named because of its spiral approach ramp that allowed the roadway to reach a high level with a minimal land foot print. The main span of this bridge was a pin-connected through truss span. The bridge is still a well-known memory around town.

The 1951 bridge was a good example of a suspended deck cantilever truss. It looks like a through arch bridge, but because the trusses extend in a continuous

The 1951 bridge was at the time it was replaced an officially recognized historic bridge. Although alternatives to avoid demolition of this historic bridge were officially considered, it is unclear that any fair and serious consideration was given to these alternatives. HistoricBridges.org documented this bridge literally one day before it was closed to traffic. At that time, the replacement bridge was practically completed, immediately west of the historic bridge. Southbound traffic flowed on the new bridge and northbound traffic was on the historic bridge. Although this was a temporary affair, it demonstrates that there was room for two bridges: that this historic bridge could have been preserved by building a new bridge next to the historic bridge and forming a one-way couplet of bridges. Indeed, this alternative would have disturbed less land because the new bridge would not need to be so wide.

Why was such an obvious alternative not given serious consideration? Probably because overly demanding expectations were put on the historic Hastings Bridge if it were to remain open for traffic. Like many historic truss bridges, this bridge is "fracture critical" which means that the bridge uses all of its members together to make the bridge "work" properly. Many agencies claim this is a great reason to bulldoze historic bridges because if one member fails, the entire bridge could (theoretically) collapse, although this is not always the case in reality. Moreover, fracture critical bridges are perfectly safe if built correctly, inspected routinely, and maintained as needed. However, these conditions should be in place for any bridge, whether fracture critical or not. Following the collapse of the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis, all fracture bridges were inspected to make sure they were not designed with improper gusset plates like the I-35W Bridge. It was found that the Hastings Bridge did not have any similar design defects. Regardless of this fact, in considering alternatives to avoid demolishing this historic bridge, MNDOT demanded that the Hastings Bridge could only be left in place for all traffic if the fracture critical aspects were eliminated. This is a difficult demand to meet and requires massive alterations to the bridge. Furthermore, given that many bridges of similar design safely carry traffic, it is unclear why they are needed. Nevertheless, this is the demand that was placed on the historic bridge in the studies, and because of this it is not surprising that the bridge was swiftly condemned to the dumpster.

Modern bridge design lacks all the creativity and variety that are two of the most fascinating aspects of studying historic bridges. Modern bridge design in the 21st Century can be divided into three categories. If nobody cares about what the new bridge will look like, a beam bridge of some sort will be built. A steel stringer or pre-stressed concrete bridge, most likely. If somebody cares what the new bridge looks like, you get two choices: cable-stayed bridge or tied arch. "Variety" as it passes today is limited to tower design (one or two towers, and one or two posts per tower) in the cable-stayed bridges, and if you want to mix up your tied arch, you can get diagonals and make it a network tied arch, and/or you can make the arches lean inward, forming a basket-handle arch bridge. Thus it is no surprise that the replacement bridge at Hastings is a network tied arch. The tall arches lack struts or sway bracing, making the bridge look unstable visually.

Divider

Photos and Videos: Hastings Bridge

Available Photo Galleries and Videos

Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.

 
View Photo Gallery
Structure Overview
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Structure Details
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Structure Overview
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Structure Details
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Demolition
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of photos showing the demolition of the bridge. Photo Credit: David R. Youngren 2013, Hastings Bridge Watch. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Demolition
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of photos showing the demolition of the bridge. Photo Credit: David R. Youngren 2013, Hastings Bridge Watch. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2017, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.