HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

Divider

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Advertisements:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

Divider

Limekiln Pike Bridge

   


Limekiln Pike Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Bridge Documented: January 21, 2010
View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Limekiln Pike (PA-152) Over Neshaminy Creek
Location
Rural: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Structure Type
Stone Semicircular Deck Arch, Fixed
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1838 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
1969
Main Span Length
20 Feet (6.1 Meters)
Structure Length
43 Feet (7.4 Meters)
Roadway Width
24.3 Feet (7.4 Meters)
Spans
2 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
46015202302106

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

View the National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form For This Historic Bridge

With an 1838 construction date, this bridge is not anywhere near the oldest example, yet it is among the older examples of stone arch bridges in Pennsylvania, and on a national scale it is an extremely old bridge, since many states do not have bridges anywhere near this old. This 172+ year old bridge today carries traffic on a busy road. The Average Daily Traffic is 11,971. The builders of this bridge could not have even imagined that their bridge would carry something called "motorized" traffic, nor could they have imagined the volume of this traffic that the bridge would serve. The bridge is truly a testimony to the quality of construction in these ancient stone arch bridges. The road this bridge is on, the Limekiln Pike, is itself a historic route that dates back to 1693. Appropriately named, the road was constructed to carry lime from kilns that were located in Upper Dublin Township.

The marble plaque on the bridge is of interest. It reads "Built By Montgomery County 1838 21 1/2 M. To Phil." What is interesting is that it is giving travelers a measure of distance to Philadelphia. The bridge was built in a time where there were no big reflective signs that had to be read by traffic moving at 55mph. The fact that a distance measurement to a major destination is displayed on the plaque also demonstrates the historic use of Limekiln Pike as an arterial route rather than a local street.

Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Stone Arch Bridge Management Plan

Discussion of Bridge

This bridge is not recommended for long-term preservation. It is among the lowest ranked of the stone arch bridges under study in this plan. It scored low or very low in five variables: transportation, waterway adequacy, development, values, and public input. Advanced scour was identified during the latest inspection. High traffic volumes occur on this bridge, which has a relatively narrow width. Additional growth is anticipated in the area and would result in a decreasing ability to support traffic flow. The waterway is inadequate and causes occasional flooding; the advanced scour is likely a result of the inadequate waterway. An inadequate waterway is a function of the size of the arch barrel, which is also the bridge's main structural element. Repairing the problem to enlarge the opening requires the reconstruction of the bridge. Returning the bridge to its historic appearance would be relatively expensive, as some of its historic fabric and form is missing. The recreational, historical, and cultural values and public input codes are very low, indicating a lack of significance for the bridge. Although an old example (1810), it was determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually because of the alterations, including the replacement of parts of the parapets with concrete and a steel guide rail. It also does not contribute to a historic district. The bridge received no public support.

Ratings

The Upper Dublin, Limekiln Road Bridge is owned by PennDOT and is ranked 122nd.
Condition Code = 48 - moderate
Transportation Code = 40 - low
Waterway Adequacy Code = 40 - low
Cost to Rehabilitate or Replace Code = 47 - moderate
Anticipated Development Code = 28 - very low
Recreational, Historical, and Cultural Values Code = 38 - very low
Public Input Code = 35 - very low

Recommendation: Not recommended for long-term preservation.

Divider

Photos and Videos: Limekiln Pike Bridge

Available Photo Galleries and Videos

Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2017, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.