Note: We are currently testing a redesign of the Bridge Browser individual bridge pages. Everything should still work, but some bugs and visual problems may occur. We hope to have this resolved soon.
This bridge will soon be the only truss bridge in all of Forest County. This bridge is also noted for annually being flooded well above the deck, making this a "seasonal" crossing to say the least. The flood waters that this bridge receives are due to a nearby dam. As such, the flood waters are not raging floodwaters that carry a truss bridge off its abutments and crush it into scrap metal downstream, but are instead more or less calm and just drown the bridge. Water levels have risen high enough such that the entire bridge was underwater. In one of these cases, after the water level dropped, a bunch of debris that was floating on the water was left on top of the truss.
Beyond being the submersible bridge, this is a good example of a standard plan massive-member Parker truss in Pennsylvania. Givens its rather rural location, HistoricBridges.org does not see its flooding problem to be enough reason to demolish the bridge. Although it is posted for a 15 ton weight limit, the bridge appeared to be in decent shape.
The historic bridge inventory says that the bridge is closed. It appears to only be closed when flooded out, otherwise you can drive across the bridge. HistoricBridges.org also saw no evidence of a sidewalk, or lattice railing. If this bridge in the middle of nowhere really did have a sidewalk, it was removed at some point.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The 1933, riveted, single span, 187'-long, Parker thru truss bridge is supported on concrete abutments with flared wingwalls. The trusses have built up upper and lower chords and rolled section verticals and diagonals. A portion of the sidewalk has been lost, and its lattice railing has been significantly damaged. The bridge, built to a state highway department standard design used with great frequency since the mid 1920s, has no innovative or distinctive details. An undistinguished example of its technology, the bridge is neither historically nor technologically significant.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The bridge carries a 2 lane road and sidewalk over a stream that is part of the Tionesta Lake flood control impounding area. The dam is approximately 4 miles upstream. The water level is just before the bridge deck, and the bridge is currently closed to all traffic. The setting is forested and sparsely developed, and does not have historic district potential.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.|
Mobile Optimized Gallery
|A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2015, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.