This bridge is similar, but not the same, as the Saginaw Railroad Swing Bridge, which also originally served Michigan Central Railroad. It is possible then that Michigan Central may have contracted the Wisconsin Bridge and Iron Company, builder of the Saginaw bridge, to build this Bay City bridge as well. Alternatively, both bridges may have been designed by Michigan Central using the same standard plan which would also account for the similarity in appearance. Like the Saginaw bridge, the Bay City Bridge has fixed through truss approach spans. This is due to the fact that Saginaw River is quite wide, and only a small portion of the bridge needed to open for boats. The Bay City spans differ from the Saginaw spans because they have v-lacing on the top chord. On the Bay City bridge, these stationary spans are two in number, and are located at the west end of the bridge. One large through plate girder span provides an eastern approach. The configuration of the swing span is a Pratt design.
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original / Full Sized photos and Mobile/Smartphone Optimized (Reduced Size) photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2017, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.