This bridge is an example of a railing height truss bascule bridge. The railing height design refers to a deck truss whose trusses are raised up slightly above the deck like a pony truss, but just high enough so that the top chord of the truss acts like a railing. The design was developed in Chicago and was popular in that city both for a number of reasons. It offered a streamlined aesthetic, yet also had a utilitarian purpose of giving the top chord of the trusses a dual function as railings. It also increased the clearance under the bridge when lowered, while still avoiding the use of a full height pony truss. This is an unusual example of this truss type outside of Chicago. This California example is unusual because its truss and the roadway both have a very notable camber to them.
This bridge was designed by Edward Von Geldern who was one of the first registered engineers in Sutter County.
Bridge Photo-Documentation Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer |
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation Mobile Optimized Photos |
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer |
CarCam: Northbound Crossing Full Motion Video |
Note: The downloadable high quality version of this video (available on the video page) is well worth the download since it offers excellent 1080 HD detail and is vastly more impressive than the compressed streaming video. Streaming video of the bridge. Also includes a higher quality downloadable video for greater clarity or offline viewing. |
© Copyright 2003-2018, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.