This bridge is noted for being an early example of a long-span steel stringer bridge. The bridge's single span 75 foot length was noteworthy at the time this bridge was built. Previously, spans of this length would have been more complex bridge types like a steel truss, or they would have been built as a multi-span stringer bridge, with shorter individual spans. The bridge is also an example of a bridge type built between 1927 and 1932 in Michigan, which was a steel stringer with aesthetic concrete encasement on the fascia beams, and also used a concrete balustrade railing. This bridge retains its original design, however the concrete balustrade railings are spalling severely. Suggested preservation work might be to replicate these original railings, something that has been done in modern times more than once here in Michigan. In contrast, the concrete encasement on the fascia beams appeared to be in good condtion.
Information and Findings From Michigan Historic Sites Online
This single-span concrete steel bridge carries County Road 557 across the West Branch of the Escanaba River. The structure is configured as a 75-foot, steel stringer bridge, with rolled I-beams supported simply by massive concrete abutments with straight wingwalls. The outside webs of the spandrel stringers have been encased in concrete with a coved profile, giving the bridge an all-concrete appearence. The stringers carry a concrete deck, which has been surfaced with asphalt. This deck is bounded on both sides by MSHD standard concrete guardrails with classical fluted balusters and paneled bulkheads. Although unaltered, the West Branch Bridge has experienced serious concrete spalling on its guardrails.
Statement of Significance
Early in 1928 engineers for the Michigan State Highway Department delineated this concrete/steel bridge in Marquette County. The department designated the structure as Bridge B1 of 52-17-21 and in March awarded a contract for its construction to the P.J. Nickel Company of Ironwood. Nickel used a steel superstructure fabrication by the Massillon Bridge and Structural Company of Massillon, Ohio, to complete the West Branch Bridge later that year. Total contract cost: $20,016.19. Since its completion, the bridge has functioned in place, in essentially unaltered condition. The bridge's steel stringer configuration is one that MSHD used extensively for bridges in the 1930s and 1940s. Although the highway department had delineated a standard steel stringer design as early as the 1905-1906 biennium, the relatively shallow I-beams that were being fabricated by the steel mills limited their span - first to 30 feet, later 45 feet. When the mills began producing deeper beams in the late 1920s, MSHD could extend the spans of its steel stringer bridges. "When this type of structure was first put to use, "MSHD stated in 1930", rolled sections of sufficient strength were not available for spans greater than forty-five feet. It was necessary, therefore, to use relatively shallow fabricated deck girders for spans greater than forty-five feet. Rather recently, however, steel mills have improved their methods and are able to furnish rolled sections which, on proper spacing, are suitable for spans up to sixty feet." Built in 1928 with a span length of 75 feet, the West Branch Bridge is technologically significant as one of the first truly long-span stringer bridges undertaken by the highway department.
This historic bridge has been demolished. This map is shown for reference purposes only.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.