HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Nahma Bridge

Turtle Island Bridge

Nahma Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: October 1, 2012

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Golf Course Pathway Over Golf Course Waterway
Location
Rural: Menominee County, Michigan: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1916 By Builder/Contractor: Joliet Bridge and Iron Company of Joliet, Illinois and Engineer/Design: Michigan State Highway Department

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
104 Feet (31.7 Meters)
Structure Length
104 Feet (31.7 Meters)
Roadway Width
16.7 Feet (5.09 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
21200040000B010

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)
View Information About HSR Ratings

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

View The Sweetgrass Golf Club Official Website

View A Historical Article Discussing The Standard Plan To Which This Bridge Was Built

About This Bridge

This bridge originally carried CR-497 over the Sturgeon River near Nahma, Michigan in Delta County. In 1995, it was closed to all traffic. In 2006, the bridge was taken off of its abutments and placed into storage and later relocated to the Sweetgrass Golf Course, which saved the bridge from demolition. In 2008, a new bridge was built in the former location of the historic bridge. At the Sweetgrass Golf Club, the historic bridge is the highlight of the course. The bridge leads to Turtle Island, where Hole 15, the signature hole of the course, is located.

This bridge is among the most historically significant pony truss bridges in Michigan. It has historic significance for several reasons. First, the bridge's 104 foot length is extremely long for a bridge of its age. Most of Michigan's pony trusses are less than 80 feet. Nationwide, nearly all pony trusses built before 1920 were less than 100 feet in length. Longer spans would have been designed as through truss bridges. As such, the bridge is technologically significant as an early, truly long-span example of a pony truss bridge. The bridge is also significant as an early example of a state standard truss bridge designed for use of the state's Trunk Line highway system. Very few examples survive of this early standard plan for pony truss bridges, which was designed by noteworthy state bridge engineer C. V. Dewart. Bridges built to this standard plan, including the Nahma Bridge, display some unusual details. In particular, the bridge design does not include traditional outriggers extending outward from the trusses to stabilize the pony truss against lateral motion. Instead, what C. V. Dewart describes as inside knee braces are present. Essentially, these are like outriggers, but on the inside of the truss lines. This design technique was common on railroad pony truss bridges, but is extremely rare on highway bridges, largely because it would reduce the available roadway width on the bridge. C. V. Dewart explains and defends the use of this design in his highway bridges in a historical article. The lattice railings on the bridge are mounted to the inside knee braces, and as a result they are not positioned perpendicular to the roadway, but instead have a slight angle to them, another unusual detail.

This bridge retains excellent historic integrity today, with no noteworthy alterations to the trusses. Given this bridge's length and the rarity of this particular standard plan design today, this is a highly significant historic bridge.

Designed by the Michigan Michigan State Highway Department to serve a trunk line highway, the truss bridge was built by the Joliet Bridge and Iron Company of Joliet, Illinois. The Michigan State Highway Department plaque for the bridge lists Nebel Brothers of Munising, Michigan as the on-site contractors for the bridge.

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Nahma Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

Divider

Maps and Links: Nahma Bridge

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):

View Bridge Location In:

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within a half mile of this bridge.

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles of this bridge.

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser

USGS National Map (United States Only)

Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)

CalTopo Maps (United States Only)


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Admin Login

Divider