HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

Divider

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Advertisements:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

Divider

Kuhl Road Bridge

   


Kuhl Road Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: November 7, 2015
View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Kuhl Road Over Neshanic River
Location
Rural: Hunterdon County, New Jersey
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1936 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
61 Feet (18.6 Meters)
Structure Length
64 Feet (19.5 Meters)
Roadway Width
18 Feet (5.5 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
10XXQ48

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

Built in the 1930s, this is an early example of an all-welded truss bridge. Composed of rolled beams lacking the traditional v-lacing and lattice found in the riveted truss bridges which were more common in this period, it is essentially very similar in design and materials to welded truss bridges built today. While notable for documenting the early years of this type of truss bridge, it lacks the significance of riveted truss bridges since unlike riveted truss bridges, welded truss bridges continue to be built today, therefore this bridge is not an example of a disappearing structure type.

This bridge does appear to retain good historic integrity. The historic bridge inventory listed the following in the builder column: "STACY (WIDDICOMBE?)"

Information and Findings From New Jersey's Historic Bridge Inventory

Discussion of Bridge

The skewed 5-panel 1936 Pratt pony truss bridge is of rolled section welded construction. It is supported on random ashlar abutments. An uncommon detail is the connecting of the center-panel diagonals to a mid-panel gusset plate. Alterations are minimal and include outriggers and guide rail railings. Although the structure is a representative example of the pony truss technology, it is not individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, nor does it currently contribute to an identified historic district.

Discussion of Surrounding Area

The bridge carries a lightly traveled rural road over a branch of the Neshanic River. It is located in a rural setting with nearby open fields and encroaching suburban housing development.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No

Divider

Photos and Videos: Kuhl Road Bridge

Available Photo Galleries and Videos

Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2017, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.