HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

IN-75 Bridge

Cutler Bridge, State Highway Bridge 3653

IN-75 Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: February 19, 2017

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
IN-75 Over Wildcat Creek
Location
Rural: Carroll County, Indiana: United States
Structure Type
Metal 8 Panel Rivet-Connected Parker Through Truss, Fixed and Approach Spans: Metal Stringer (Multi-Beam), Fixed
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1948 By Builder/Contractor: R. L. Schutt of Indianapolis, Indiana

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
2001
Main Span Length
175 Feet (53 Meters)
Structure Length
240 Feet (73 Meters)
Roadway Width
28 Feet (8.53 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s) and 1 Approach Span(s)
NBI Number
24970

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This is a well-preserved example of a state highway Parker truss in Indiana noted for its arched portal bracing.

Information and Findings From DHPA Historic Bridge Survey

Statement of Significance

R. L. Schutt of Indianapolis, Indiana, won an $118,373.20 contract in July 1947 to build a two-span, state-design structure consisting of a 61-ft. 6-in. I-beam approach and a 175-ft. Parker through-truss upon a concrete substructure. The bridge was officially not completed until the beginning of March, 1948. The ISHC used a revised version of its fifth-generation standard plan #1551 for a 175-ft., riveted, Parker through-truss span with a 28-ft. roadway plus a pair of 2-ft. walks also inside the trusses. Truss depth varied from 23 ft. at the portal to 34 ft. 4 in. at midspan. Each truss carried eight panels, the outer two at 20 ft. 3 in. and the inner four at 23 ft. 6 in. Every top chord member is differently sloped; none is parallel with the lower chord; and all were fabricated from a pair of 15- in. channels (@40# for the endposts, third, and fourth panels, and @53.9# for the second). For the lower chord, 10-in. I-beams grow in weight from the outer panels (@66#) to the inner-most one (@100#). The state used rolled I-beams in some truss web members. The verticals or posts consist of two forms and weights: the hip and the fourth are 10-in. I-beams (@33#); the second and third are fabricated from a pair of laced 10-in. channels (@15.3#). To protect the quite-tall trusses against wind and vehicle-induced stress, substantial latticed struts and heavy upper sway framing buttress the verticals above 15 ft. of roadway clearance. The portals used latticed sections, too. While a 10-in. I-beam (@37#) provided the second-panel diagonal, the others used a pair of laced 10-in. channels (@15.3#). None of the panels was countered. The ISHC prescribed 33-in. I floor-beams (@200#) riveted to the verticals above the lower chord. Ten rows of rolled I-beam stringers attached to the floor-beams' sides varied in depth and weight by placement. The 20-ft. panels used 16-in. Is; the 23-ft. 6-in. ones relied on 18-in Is. Outside stringers were lighter than inner ones. Weights varied on 20-ft. panels from 36 lbs. (outer) to 50 lbs (inner); on the 23-ft. panels from 50 lbs to 55 lbs. Together, the floor-beams and the stringers carry the concrete deck. Angles supply each lower sway-bracing member. Tube-channel-and- post rails lined the inner sides of the trusses, and coped concrete approach rails with bush- hammered panels funneled traffic into the spans. This bridge provides one of several extant--and certainly one of the latest--examples of this fifth-generation standard plan for a fairly-long through-truss span. The trusses retain their original members. The metal guardrails and the concrete approach ones remain. The concrete deck has been replaced.

Other Information

References Indiana State Highway Commission, Structure, #75-J-3653; Contract, #2814; Superstructure Standard, #1551.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: IN-75 Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

Divider

Maps and Links: IN-75 Bridge

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
40.481860,-86.530070

View Bridge Location In:

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within a half mile of this bridge.

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles of this bridge.

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser

USGS National Map (United States Only)

Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)

CalTopo Maps (United States Only)


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider