HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.
Historic Bridge Finder App: Find Nearby Bridges

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Old IN-158 Bridge

Lawrence County Bridge 100

Old IN-158 Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth and Rick McOmber

Bridge Documented: May 10, 2010

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Old IN-158 Over Salt Creek
Location
Rural: Lawrence County, Indiana: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1876 By Builder/Contractor: Smith Bridge Company of Toledo, Ohio

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
1906
Main Span Length
95 Feet (28.96 Meters)
Structure Length
97.3 Feet (29.66 Meters)
Roadway Width
14.8 Feet (4.51 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
4700125

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

This bridge no longer exists!

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge has a plaque that identifies it as a bridge built by the Smith Bridge Company. The lightweight and nonstandard details of this bridge demonstrate its extremely early construction date, including lightweight vertical members, and extremely lightweight portal bracing with corrugated or "ribbon lacing." The details of this bridge are for the most part unlike those the Smith Bridge Company used in later years, further example of its early construction. The only details that would be seen in later bridges is the used of a rolled beam for the sway bracing and the unusual cast iron shoes and bearings for the bridge. This bridge has been abandoned, but it retains remarkable historic integrity, especially considering the bridge's age. This bridge may be the oldest remaining metal bridge built by the noteworthy Smith Bridge Company in the country. If so, the bridge is nationally significant, given that Smith Bridge Company's influence stretched over a significant number of states. This bridge should be fully restored and provided with a long-term preservation commitment.

Information and Findings From DHPA Historic Bridge Survey

Statement of Significance

The prolific Ohio firm followed an early standard pattern with these trusses. The lightness of members, the need to reinforce rolled I beams, the use of loop-welded eyebars, and the extensive countering are all examples of early form. The undecorated structure retains its original members.

Architectural Description

The Smith Bridge Company of Toledo, Ohio, fabricated this pin-connected Pratt through span which is seated upon cut stone abutments and wingwalls. Intermediate verticals of reinforced I beams subdivide the 97'4" trusses into most of their eight panels. A pair of loop-welded and cylindrical eyebars serves as the diagonal sets, and single, cylindrical rods with turnbuckles counter the diagonals in the four most central panels. U-bolted to the lower pins, I floor beams carry the asphalt-over-timber deck with its 14'9" roadway and 15'6" of vertical clearance.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Old IN-158 Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2019, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider