HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.
Historic Bridge Finder App: Find Nearby Bridges

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Range Line Road Bridge

Lake County Bridge 2

Range Line Road Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: August 13, 2006

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Range Line Road (Clay Street) Over Kankakee River
Rural: Lake County, Indiana: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1920 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Main Span Length
167 Feet (50.9 Meters)
Structure Length
169 Feet (51.51 Meters)
Roadway Width
19 Feet (5.79 Meters)
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

This bridge is in storage!

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

View The Memorandum of Agreement For This Historic Bridge

This is a nice looking riveted through truss bridge. The Indiana Bridge marketing page for this bridge says a timber deck was added to the steel deck in 1991. Seeing a traditional late 1800s style wooden deck on a 1920s truss bridge is rather unusual. This bridge is an impressive riveted Parker truss, and it features extensive v-lacing and is traditionally composed. It looks a little like a Camelback truss, but if you look close, there are more than five slopes present, making it a Parker truss. The portal bracing is an a-frame design. Lattice railings remain on the bridge, although there is extensive damage to these. There are Inland mill marks on the bridge as well as Illinois mill marks.

The fate of this bridge is uncertain. It is slated for replacement, but the bridge will be dismantled and put into storage for a period of at least 15 years, and during these 15 years the bridge will be available for reuse. The Kankakee Valley Historical Society has indicated they would like to relocate and preserve the bridge, but need several years to raise money. This plan will hopefully give them the time they need to do so.

Information and Findings From DHPA Historic Bridge Survey

Statement of Significance

Except for its heavier diagonals, this is a rather standard nine-panel Camelback. The bridge retains its original members and latticed guardrails.

Architectural Description

Resting upon its concrete abutments and wingwalls, this all-riveted Camelback through truss spans 168' in nine panels with verticals of a single size of laced channels. Double angles riveted to stay plates comprise heavier than usual diagonals, but they function in the typical manner, set inward from the top to bottom chord in all central and side section panels. Only in the most central panel is there a cross diagonal. I floor beams are riveted to gussets above the lower chord whose members are fabricated like the diagonals. The timber deck sports a 19'5" roadway and 16' of vertical clearance.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes


Photo Galleries and Videos: Range Line Road Bridge

View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Home Top


About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2019, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.