This is one of the most unusual and unique bridges in the country. At quick glance it looks like a very small cantilever truss bridge. However, closer inspection on the arrangement of the truss members suggests it functions in another manner. Most sources consulted seem to have agreed that this bridge lacks cantilever function. Without engineering study, two possibilities remain. Each span may function as a simple truss, with the "towers" and adjacent top chord sections being largely decorative. In this case, the unusual truss shape of the center span has been described as a "Reserve Parker." Another possibility is that the bridge may function as a continuous (but not cantilever) truss. If so, it would be an early use of continuous truss design, and as such it might not be a totally perfect representation of continuous truss design, as this was more or less a period where continuous truss design was somewhat experimental.
Despite its unique design, the bridge sits abandoned and overgrown. This bridge deserves no less then the highest preservation priority.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Approach this abandoned bridge from the south.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.