Cantilever deck truss bridges like this one are often mistaken for arch bridges. However, due to an unusual feature with this bridge, few will make that mistake here. The bottom chord of this bridge turns into an end-post of sorts and meets the deck at mid-span. This gives the bridge a rather unusual appearance. If it were an arch bridge it would not stand like this, and would collapse, since with arch bridges, the arch needs to run continuous and support needed most in the center. With a cantilever bridge however, the strength starts at the support and goes out, like the limbs on a tree. Therefore, each half of this bridge could stand independently of each other and still support weight. For this reason, there really was no need for support at the center of this bridge, so engineers brought the bottom chord back up to the deck.
This bridge is significant as an uncommon example of a cantilever deck truss that dates to the late 1930s, although the exact date is unknown. It was built to access a mine, and was used until the 1960s. It features riveted connections, and built-up members and chords that include attractive lattice and v-lacing. it is located in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. The bridge is hard to photograph even in the winter, plus to make matters worse, signs mounted on the trails warn people of dangerous snakes.
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original Size photos and Mobile Optimized photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
© Copyright 2003-2019, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.