With a 200 foot span, this bridge is among the longest Parker truss spans in the state of Missouri. The bridge retains good integrity. Located on old US-60 alignment, this bridge should be preserved for its historic and aesthetic value. The bridge is on old US-61 alignment but today carries local traffic on a county road.
This bridge is one of Missouri's remaining standard plan
truss bridges. As the first and second decades of the 20th Century passed
by, the movement to have states develop standard plans for bridges for the
purpose of bringing a greater measure of quality control, efficiency, and
consistency to bridgework in the nation took hold. In response to this
movement, states developed standard plans for the bridge types that were
most common and functional during the period. From the mid 1910s through the
1940s, many (but not all) states had developed standard plans for truss
bridges which were used to in situations where large spans were desirable.
While these standard plan truss bridges meant an end to the diversity of
truss bridge appearances and designs seen during the earlier period where
individual bridge companies designed the bridges, these standard plan truss
bridges remained among the most intricate and visually intriguing bridge
types. In addition, variety was still achieved because these standard plans
were revised over the years, and different designs for different span
lengths existed, and differences in skew and span numbers create additional
variety. Moreover, these standard plan truss bridges are interesting because
while they are all similar within each state, they are quite different from
state to state because each state designed its own standard plans for truss
bridges, and the designs they chose might be quite different from other
states. Among the fifty states differences seen among truss bridge standard
plans include truss configuration, portal bracing designs, built-up and
rolled beam designs and placements, railing, and plaques.
Missouri's standard plans for trusses are usually either a Parker truss (long spans), a Pratt through truss (medium spans), and a subdivided Warren pony truss (short spans). Perhaps the most distinctive feature of Missouri's standard plan through truss bridges is their portal bracing. On most truss bridges, the portal bracing is the most structurally and visually substantial piece of bracing on the bridge. While Missouri's portal bracing may be structurally substantial, visually it is one of the smallest portal bracings ever seen, consisting of a single rolled or built-up beam, depending on the bridge. The sway bracing on through truss bridges is also simple, often being the same design as the portal bracing, if less massive. In contrast, the diagonals and verticals of the truss web tend to be built-up beams that are more visually appealing because they contain a combination of v-lacing and battens to create their built-up beams at these locations. Top chords on the bridges are generally built-up box beams that include v-lacing on the bottom. Indeed, v-lacing is the trend on these bridges for built-up beams, along with battens. Lattice is not usually seen. Plaques on the bridges are simple and uninformative, with historical information limited to no more than the construction date. Looking at all the features of Missouri's standard plan truss bridges, in terms of aesthetic quality, they rate similarly in aesthetic quality standard plan truss bridges in other states.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.