This is one of two similar bridges on this road that originally was a historic riveted pony truss and was replaced with a modern bridge. However, the historic truss lines were salvaged and placed on the new bridges as decorative elements. While this cannot be described as historic bridge preservation, this type of work is an outstanding example of Section 106 mitigation for demolition and replacement of a historic bridge, because this form of mitigation preserves a substantial amount of the original materials and original appearance of the replaced historic bridge.
The mystery with these two bridges is that according to the Historic Bridge Inventory this one of the two was not considered officially National Register Eligible which would mean Section 106 didn't apply and mitigation was not required. Did the county just save these trusses out of respect of the fact that even ineligible bridge still has historic and aesthetic value... and perhaps because the other (nearly identical) truss down the road WAS considered eligible?
This pony truss bridge was built at an unknown location at an unknown date and relocated and reused here in 1957 where it replaced a stone arch bridge.
Dimensions given above are for the pony truss prior to replacement. See the National Bridge Inventory sheet for current bridge dimensions.
Information and Findings From New Jersey's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The 5-panel Warren with verticals pony truss uses riveted construction. It is supported on concrete abutments with wingwalls. It was installed at this site in 1957, replacing an 1830 2-span stone arch bridge, and it appears that it is an earlier truss rebuilt for this location. The original date of the trusses is not documented, but stylistically it is a ca. 1920 span. The bridge is a representative example of a common type and is not technologically or historically distinguished.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The bridge carries a 2-lane county road over the Neshanic River in a wooded rural setting. The surrounding land is used for agricultural purposes.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No
This bridge is tagged with the following special condition(s): Trusses Converted To Decorative
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.