View Information About HSR Ratings
This bridge was also listed as going over the RJ Corman-Western Ohio Line. The rail line is currently owned by Norfolk Southern, previously Norfolk and Western. This bridge is on the Dixie Highway, which was a major highway from the old days that essentially did the job of I-75 back then.
While 1880s pin connected truss bridges may be more rare and significant, it would be a boring world without these wonders of the 1920s and 1930s. Bridges like these offer a different type of awe and beauty that could not be found back in the late 1800s. Bridges built in this period of time began to lack the decorative elements like ornate portal bracing and fancy railings. However, some bridges from these later periods offered a bold, imposing aesthetic. These are bridges that demand to be seen, and refuse to let anyone cross without realizing they are on a bridge. This particular bridge illustrates this aesthetic particularly well. This bridge has many built-up beams with lattice and v-lacing, as well as a complex Baltimore truss configuration. These aspects, combined with a heavy skew all combine to form
This bridge is unusual for several reasons. First its heavy skew is uncommon. Its Baltimore truss configuration is also unusual. The fact that it is pin-connected is extremely unusual and rare for a post-1920 truss bridge.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge InventorySetting/Context The bridge carries 2 lanes of traffic and a sidewalk over 11 tracks of the Norfolk Southern RR yard in Lima. Physical Description The bridge has a 308'-long main span that is a heavily skewed, pin-connected, Baltimore thru truss with massive portal bracing. It is traditionally composed of built-up compression members and eye bar tension members. The approach spans are 20'-long T beams. The bridge is supported on concrete bents and abutments. Integrity Deck and railing replacement, 1988. Summary of Significance The 1923 Baltimore thru truss bridge is a complete long-span example of its type/design. The truss type/design was developed in the 1870s and used through the 1920s. Although a technologically late example, it is
1 of only 3 dating from 1923 to 1930 in the survey, and the only pin-connected example. Other than deck replacement, there has been no significant change in the bridge's status since the prior inventory. The eligible recommendation
of the prior inventory remains appropriate. Justification The late example of a pin connected thru truss is one of 13 extant examples of pin connected bridges with polygonal upper chords and/or subdivided panels in the state that date from 1888 until 1923. Moderate significance. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes |
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) of this bridge.
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of this bridge.
Additional Maps:
Google Streetview (If Available)
GeoHack (Additional Links and Coordinates)
Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)
Apple Maps (Apple devices only)
Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App
Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)
Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)
Directions Via Sygic For Android
Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser
USGS National Map (United States Only)
Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)
Historic Aerials (United States Only)
CalTopo Maps (United States Only)
© Copyright 2003-2024, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.