Driving over this bridge, it appears as though you are on a modern bridge, with its ugly standard concrete barriers and wide roadway. However, looking underneath reveals an ancient and much more narrow stone arch bridge. The bridge is a two-span stone arch bridge. The modern deck was cantilevered off of the edges of the stone arch, allowing for a wider roadway, while maintaining the dimensions of the original bridge. The original stone arch bridge would have to be very well-built and strong to handle the additional dead loads that a wider deck can support in addition to the heavy traffic it carries. Because the bridge is substantially altered, and its aesthetic qualities are also diminished by the modern deck the bridge is not as noteworthy as it could be otherwise. However, the arch itself, below the deck, appears to be largely unaltered and it has to be acknowledged that stone arch bridges of any integrity are rare in Ontario.
Interpretive signage by the bridge comments that Beckwith Street as originally laid out was very wide for its time (note the space between the old downtown buildings). However, the bridge, as originally built, was narrow. Its modern width actually matches up better with the wide appearance of the downtown street. Even by today's standards Beckwith Street downtown is fairly wide, with cars able to park on an angle rather than parallel on the street.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.