View Information About HSR Ratings
This bridge is an excellent representative example of its type in Pennsylvania. The bridge appears to be complete including original plaques.
This bridge has been found not historic by the Historic Bridge Inventory. However, this assessment is outdated. For example, it does not reflect the demolition of other similar bridges in the area and even within this county. The bridge is a relatively early example of a truss bridge with riveted connections, and it retains excellent historic integrity. Bridges like this are disappearing from Pennsylvania's landscape, a fact highlighted by the reality that this bridge itself is slated for demolition and replacement.
Although this bridge does show deterioration in the form of section loss on the floorbeams and deck stringers, these are elements often replaced during a rehabilitation. It appears that a rehabilitation project could be developed for this bridge in place of a demolition and replacement project. If however plans to demolish this bridge remain, HistoricBridges.org suggests salvaging the trusses and placing them on the replacement bridge as a decoration, which would retain some of the original bridge and its appearance.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge InventoryDiscussion of Bridge The single span, 108'-long, rivet-connected Warren with verticals pony truss bridge built between 1907 and 1911 is supported on stone abutments. The 10 panel truss has built-up members of standard steel sections. Rolled floorbeams and stringers support a timber deck. Stock lattice railings are set to the interior faces of the trusses. The Warren truss type/design, patented in 1848, emerged as one of the most commonly used truss designs after 1895 because of advances in metallurgy and improvements in field pneumatic riveting. Over 125 examples from the late 1870s to 1950s have been identified in the state. This 1907-11 example has no noteworthy or unusual features or details. It is not an early or significant example of the work of the Penn Bridge Co., which was very active in the eastern United States from the 1870s to 1930s. Nor is it significant for its historic association with the 1895 state bridge act, a relatively ineffective law that provided funding for rebuilding county-owned bridges from 1895 to 1923. The bridge is not historically or technologically distinguished by its setting or context. Discussion of Surrounding Area The single lane bridge carries an unimproved road over a stream in a rural setting of woods and scattered late 20th century houses. All of the immediate quadrants are wooded. The setting does not appear to have historic district potential. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No |
This historic bridge has been demolished. This map is shown for reference purposes only.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) of this bridge.
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of this bridge.
Additional Maps:
Google Streetview (If Available)
GeoHack (Additional Links and Coordinates)
Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)
Apple Maps (Apple devices only)
Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App
Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)
Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)
Directions Via Sygic For Android
Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser
USGS National Map (United States Only)
Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)
Historic Aerials (United States Only)
CalTopo Maps (United States Only)
© Copyright 2003-2024, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.
