This stone arch bridge is a nice looking bridge. Unlike many of the stone arch bridges built in Chester County in the early 20th Century under the direction of county engineer Nathan Rambo, the bridge does not have a brick arch ring. In addition, it has the unique feature of a marble keystone with 1912 inscribed into it.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The one-span, 30'-long stone arch bridge, built 1912, has voussoirs with keystone, fieldstone spandrel walls, and parapets with slate coping. It is supported on stone abutments. The intrados is pargetted and the bridge has grapevine repointing. It is a short and undistinguished example of a bridge type that is common from the first two decades of the 20th century in Chester County. The county-built traditional stone arch bridges were favored by the county engineer, and at least 19 similar bridges from 1908 to 1919 have been identified. Stone arch bridges have been in use in Pennsylvania since the late 17th century, and over 350 examples have been identified statewide, with more than two-thirds dating to before 1900. Early 20th century examples in Chester County are considered individually significant in the local context only when they are complete and large or particularly well detailed. This example is not historically or technologically distinguished within its population or by its setting and context.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The bridge carries 1 lane of a 2 lane road over a stream in an area of suburban commercial development north of US 202. South of the bridge are late-20th-century office parks. At the bridge's northwest quadrant is a parking lot associated with a township park with playgrounds and recreational fields. The setting does not have historic district potential.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No, Later Reevaluated as Individually Eligible, Per Management Plan
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Stone Arch Bridge Management Plan
Discussion of Bridge
The bridge is not a strong candidate for long-term preservation. It ranks in the lower half of all stone arch bridges under study in this plan. The bridge is individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and is part of a greenway. The condition code is high. However, the bridge has not received public support. The waterway is only marginally adequate. Waterway adequacy is a function of the size of the arch barrel, which is also the main structural element. Widening the barrel requires the bridge to be rebuilt. The bridge's transportation code is low; it is not able to adequately handle its current traffic volume, the bridge is located on a curve, and it has poor sight distances. Moreover, it is located in an area of moderate development, where future traffic can be expected to increase somewhat, exacerbating the traffic problem. The cost to rehabilitate the bridge is moderate, making it moderately expensive to rehabilitate its historic form and fabric.
The Tredyffrin, Mill Road Bridge is owned by Chester
County and is ranked 67th.
Recommendation: Not a strong candidate for long-term preservation.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.