HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.
Historic Bridge Finder App: Find Nearby Bridges

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Cogley Bridge

Pebble Road Bridge

Cogley Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: July 2, 2006

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Pebble Road (TR-738) Over South Branch Bear Creek
Location
Rural: Armstrong County, Pennsylvania: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1910 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
1971
Main Span Length
49 Feet (14.94 Meters)
Structure Length
54 Feet (16.46 Meters)
Roadway Width
13.5 Feet (4.11 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
37227073800060

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This small subdivided Warren pony truss with riveted connections, built ca. 1910 is attractive because it is has a lot of v-lacing and lattice for its design and age. V-lacing is present on the diagonals and lattice is on the verticals. There is also v-lacing under the top chord. Original lattice railings also remain on the bridge. A metal grate deck is present, although the metal grating is not the usual bridge deck style, it is more like the type used on walkways and such. The bridge is slightly skewed. It is a very rural bridge, and carries hardly any traffic. Because of this and its small size, it is hard to imagine that rehabilitating this bridge to ensure it will serve traffic for another century would be a costly endeavor.

Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory

Discussion of Bridge

The ca. 1910, skewed, riveted, 54'-long, Warren with verticals pony truss is supported on ashlar abutments with flared wingwalls. An example of a standardized design, the trusses have no innovative or distinctive details. The upper chords and end posts are built up box sections, and the verticals and diagonals are angles with either laced or lattice webs. The bridge is undocumented, and it is an example of the most common early 20th century pony truss design in the region and state. The technology was introduced into the state ca. 1895 and was well established by the time this bridge was built. Approximately 90 erected examples prior to 1910 survive throughout the Commonwealth. Neither the bridge nor its setting are historically or technologically significant.

Discussion of Surrounding Area

The bridge carries 1 lane of an unimproved township road over a stream in a sparsely developed, wooded setting that does not have rural historic district potential.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Cogley Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2019, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider