One of the rarest types of movable bridge, this is the only known retractile bridge in Canada. The bridge was being repaired when HistoricBridges.org visited it. The bridge appears to be in a state of preservation. Although originally a vehicular bridge, it appears the bridge today only serves pedestrian traffic. The bridge operates for boats. If anyone has photos or videos of the bridge in operation and is willing to share them, please contact HistoricBridges.org. The bridge is a simple design. Unlike some retractile bridges that roll back at an angle, this one rolls directly backwards. The span itself is a simple stringer bridge. The cable sheaves on the bridge are cast iron and appear to say "L L Co. Montreal 1(8?)93. There is a hole drilled where what is assumed to be an 8 is located. Thus, it is assumed this bridge dates to 1893, but this is a guess. The number could also be a casting part number. Also, the L L Company might just refer to the casting company, and they may have not built the whole bridge. If anyone has further information on this bridge, which is one of the most unique bridges in Canada, please contact us. This bridge crosses the Canal de Chambly which is a National Historic Site of Canada. In the opinion of HistoricBridges.org, these historic bridges contribute to the heritage of the canal and should be preserved. To date, some of these bridges have been preserved, while others have been demolished.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.