This six-panel truss bridge with a 16 foot (4.88 meters) vertical clearance bears a number of similarities to Wrought Iron Bridge Company structures, such as the East Delhi Road Bridge. The lack of v-lacing on verticals and sway bracing is one similarity, as well as the bracing rod that runs parallel to the top chord at the center of the bridge overhead. In addition, the unusual four-pronged connection detail on the hip vertical is similar to that seen on Wrought Iron Bridge Company bridges like the Dewey Road Bridge. It is unclear whether this is enough evidence to link this bridge to the Wrought Iron Bridge Company, however, these are undeniably defining characteristics of the Lowell Road Bridge.
There was damage to the western half of the northern portal bracing, possibly due to the clearance restrictions not being observed by drivers.
Clinton County Road Commission has dismantled this bridge and is giving it to Historic Bridge Park, so this bridge has not been lost forever. However Lowell Road will no longer be a trip back in time. The modern bridge built in its place is a welded truss bridge placed on modern concrete abutments with stone-shaped stamps on them. This was done as a "context-sensitive" replacement as mitigation for removing the historic bridge. While the replacement bridge may be an impressive and unusual example of a modern bridge that actually offers something in the way of aesthetics, it does not fill the shoes of its predecessor in any manner. As a welded, warren pony truss, the only similarities the two bridges share is that they are truss bridges. The historic bridge is a pin-connected Pratt through truss. In modern engineering, to see a new bridge with even the smallest element of beauty is something that is noteworthy and should be applauded. It is important not only to preserve historic bridges, but to ensure that any modern bridges that are constructed are also an attractive feature on the roadway. However, the construction of an attractive modern bridge does not justify the demolition of a historic bridge. In the case of Lowell Road, where the historic bridge will have a new life at Historic Bridge Park, this may have been an acceptable compromise. However, in other cases where the historic bridge is demolished, any decorations added to a modern bridge do not excuse the loss of heritage and superior beauty that a historic bridge offers over any aesthetic modern bridge. In some cases, these so-called context sensitive solutions do nothing more than mock the beauty and heritage that historic bridge enthusiasts have been deprived of through the demolition.
The photos of the historic bridge available in the photo gallery were taken shortly before the bridge was removed. A fair amount of the natural forest around the bridge was severely disturbed and destroyed. In addition, Rick McOmber provided a photo showing the bridge prior to the removal of the trees. Also available in the photo gallery are a few photos of the modern bridge, for comparison purposes.
Information and Findings From MDOT
The MDOT inventory shows only about thirty structures dating from 1900 and before -- fully twelve of them dated circa 1900 -- that appear to be Pratt through trusses. This bridge is dated 1896. In our opinion all Pratt through trusses dated 1900 and before that retain at least an average degree of integrity, including the Lowell Road Bridge -- appear to meet the National Register criteria based on their age.
This bridge is tagged with the following special condition(s): Available
This historic bridge has been demolished. This map is shown for reference purposes only.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.