This attractive bridge is an excellent example of a camelback truss. Although this bridge has riveted connections, the bridge's truss shape follows the classic shape of a camelback truss that had been used with pin-connected truss bridges in the years before rivet-connected truss bridges like this one became common. That shape involves the five slopes of the top chord, with the section parallel to the bottom chord being the longest section.
Otherwise, the bridge is traditionally composed for a bridge built in the first couple decades of the 20th Century. The bridge appears to retain excellent structural and historic integrity overall.
The National Bridge Inventory gives a 1928 construction date for this bridge. Other sources give a 1911 construction date. Further, a rehabilitation date of 1935 is provided in the National Bridge Inventory. Further, a 1936 concrete t-beam bridge is present only 200 feet away from this bridge. If the truss bridge was built in 1928, it would have only been eight years old when this "replacement" t-beam was constructed and only seven years old when the 1935 rehabilitation was performed. On that basis, the 1928 construction seems like it could be incorrect since it would be odd to have a second bridge built so so after the truss was built and equally odd to have to rehabilitate a seven year old bridge.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.