This bridge is an excellent example of a standard plan concrete through girder in Illinois. The bridge is unaltered and retains near-perfect historic integrity, and also remains in good structural condition despite never having been repaired or rehabilitated. The only major blemish on the bridge is spalling at the end of a girder. The bridge is a relatively long span for a concrete through girder, although in Illinois and Iroquois County there are larger span examples. This bridge is also significant for its very early 1916 construction date. It was around this time when concrete girders began to be built with frequency. As such, this bridge should be considered historically and technologically significant. Concrete through girders are a nationally rare structure type today. Their popularity only lasted for about 20 years, mainly between 1915 and 1935, mainly because they were inefficient for deck widths much wider than 22 feet. Michigan and Illinois both appear to have the largest numbers of surviving concrete through girders in the country. This does not mean either state has a large actual number however. As such, surviving examples that have integrity should be considered to have historic value. The bridges tend to be heavily built and very durable. Those examples that are located on quiet rural roads such as this one make good candidates for preservation.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.