HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Feeder Dam Bridge

Clay County Bridge 208

Feeder Dam Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: May 26, 2019

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Towpath Road Over Eel River
Location
Rural: Clay County, Indiana: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1894 By Builder/Contractor: C.F. Hunt Company of Indianapolis, Indiana

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
202 Feet (62 Meters)
Structure Length
206 Feet (63 Meters)
Roadway Width
18 Feet (5.49 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
1100175

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

View National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form For This Bridge

Above: Builder plaque from Historic American Engineering Record Documentation

Information and Findings From DHPA Historic Bridge Survey

Bridge History and Significance

William F. T. McKee operated a ferry at this location from around the opening of the canal in 1850 until 1878 when Muehler and Notter built a wooden bridge for $8,700. After the timber structure burned at night in July of 1893, the county contracted for a wrought iron span to be set atop the stone abutments Muehler and Notter had built. The C. F. Hunt Company of Indianapolis secured the job for $5,000 in September 1894 and completed the new superstructure by early 1895. C. F. Hunt and J. D. Adams started as partners as early as 1888 in building and selling road machinery and bridges, and they continued under shifting arrangements for more than a decade. In 1894, C. F. Hunt organized a company under his own name, in which he served as foreman, and advertised as "bridge builders." The company existed until at least 1901. The commissioners ordered repairs to the Feeder Dam bridge in 1907-1908. In August 1908, Ed Grimes was paid $80 for painting the bridge. E. J. Schauwecker won a contract for $357 in September 1913 to refloor the bridge and rebolt the fellow guards. The Hunt Company fabricated a double-intersection Pratt (Whipple) through-truss span. Astride its original cut stone abutments, this high, long (204'), and decorated structure contains eleven panels with intermediate verticals of two sizes of latticed channels (outer as heavier) riveted to pin plates above and reinforcing pin plates below. The upper pins of the two central verticals carry cylindrical diagonals with turnbuckles. Most other diagonals are die-forged eyebars pinned to the vertical as it passes through at about midpoint. The high trusses carry a latticed portal strut and laced interior ones at the upper panel points. They also carry intermediate struts which effectively reduce vertical clearance to 15'5": latticed with curved bracing at the portals; I-bars on the interior. Double U-bolted to the lower pins, the I floor-beams support the asphalt-over-timber deck which provides an 18'3" roadway. "Latticed hub guards" line the trusses. Finials and cresting above the portals also add a touch of elegance to the bridge. The only surviving example of this secondary Hoosier builder, this truss retains its original members and much of its decoration. The practice of intermediate pinning of diagonals seen here is quite unusual. References Beam, Longest & Neff, Inc., Bridge Inventory Rating and Safety Inspection: Clay County (Indianapolis, 1973, 1979). bridge nameplate. Clay County, "Commissioners Record," 13: 438, 451-452; 14: 51, 458-460; 24: 2, 6; 26: 442. "Index to Commissioners Record," 23: 376, 525, 547. "Commissioners Docket," 5: 11 Jan., 9 April 1895. Consolidated Illustrating Co., Indianapolis of Today (Indianapolis, 1896), 175. HAER IN-21 (13 photos, 1974). Thomas Slade (ed.), Historic American Buildings Survey in Indiana (Bloomington, 1983), 131. William Travis, History of Clay County (Chicago, 1909), I: 67-69, 80.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Feeder Dam Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

Divider

Maps and Links: Feeder Dam Bridge

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):

View Bridge Location In:

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within a half mile of this bridge.

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles of this bridge.

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser

USGS National Map (United States Only)

Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)

CalTopo Maps (United States Only)


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider