View Information About HSR Ratings
This bridge is one of the more ornately decorated concrete bridges to be found. Some concrete arch bridges faced the spandrel walls in stone, this bridge instead has a brick facing, which is very rare and gives the bridge a unique, distinctive appearance. The bridge is complimented by the more limited use of stone on the arches and railing. The bridge is assumed to contain a Melan type of reinforcing, since noted local engineer and designer A. W. Grosvenor preferred this type and likely used it in his design of this bridge. Melan arch bridges are extremely rare on a nationwide basis.
Information and Findings From DHPA Historic Bridge SurveyStatement of Significance This is the oldest extant Grosvenor design and one of the most intrically-decorated bridges in the state. Engineering News printed a two-page description of the structure's decor. The bridge retains its architectural integrity. Architectural Description A.W. Grosvenor of Fort Wayne designed a number of concrete arches which different contractors built in and around Allen County in the second decade of the 20th Century. About half a dozen bridges he designed have
survived. Other Information The Allen county commissioners approved Asa Grosvenor's proposed plans for the Tennessee Avenue Bridge on 12 June 1911, and let a contract a month later to the Lafayette Engineering Company, Walker Marshall, president, for $38,000. The board rejected a number of proposals for a metal-truss structure. The county accepted the structure as satisfactorily completed in December 1912. The rings are segmental, probably with Melan-system reinforcing, and raised vertically on the abutment and pier. Solid spandrel walls retain the earth fill which supports the asphalt roadway between 7-foot sidewalks. The bridge has an ornamental facing of dark brick and white oolitic Bedford limestone. The rings are faced in stone, the spandrel walls in brick, and the balustrade panels of brick while the copings and posts are of stone. This is the oldest extant Grosvenor design and one of the most intricately-decorated bridges in the state. Engineering News printed a two-page description of the structure's dcor. The bridge retains its structural and architectural integrity. 105 foot spans; Flemish bond brick facing on spandrel walls and rails. References Butler, Fairman & Seufert, Inc., Bridge Inspection/Reinspection Report: Allen County (Indianapolis, 1973, 1977, 1981). SIECO, Inc., Bridge Reinspection Report: Allen County (1993, 1995). Bridge nameplate. Allen County, "Commissioners Record," 7: 90, 118-119, 220, 275; 8: 142 "Construction News," Engineering News, 15 September 1910: 120; 20 July 1911: 26. C. E. Drayer, "Concrete Bridges with Stone and Brick Facing," Engineering News, 24 June 1915: 1214-1215. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes |
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) of this bridge.
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of this bridge.
Additional Maps:
Google Streetview (If Available)
GeoHack (Additional Links and Coordinates)
Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)
Apple Maps (Apple devices only)
Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App
Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)
Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)
Directions Via Sygic For Android
Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser
USGS National Map (United States Only)
Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)
Historic Aerials (United States Only)
CalTopo Maps (United States Only)
© Copyright 2003-2024, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.