This two span pony truss bridge is unusual for two main reasons. First, it is an example of a multi span pony truss, which is uncommon. Typically, pony truss bridges were used for short crossings, and a longer crossing would be spanned by one or more through trusses, since through truss bridges could achieve longer spans and this would reduce the number of spans needed. It is not always immediately clear why a bridge might deviate from this practice and use multiple pony truss spans, however issues such as cost, soil conditions, and river conditions could all affect the decision making process. This bridge however is quite unusual since not only is it a multi-span pony truss, each span is quite short at only 53 feet. This crossing could have been accomplished with a single short 106 foot through truss span. Regardless of the reason, this bridge is another example of how diverse and infinitely fascinating historic bridges can be.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.