This bridge is a traditional pin-connected Pratt truss bridge. The Historic Bridge Inventory form is confusing because it claims an 1885 construction date and claims the bridge was designed by famous engineer Charles H. Latrobe of Baltimore. However, the design of this bridge with its a-frame portal bracing and traditional member design looks like an early 20th century pin-connected truss bridge. On top of that the older photos within the Historic Bridge Inventory form show the bridge with the original railing design on them... these railings were a unique design of riveted bars arranged to form squares (not a traditional lattice railing) and that unique design was only ever used by the York Bridge Company. So there are two possibilities. One, the 1885 bridge had its railings replaced by the York Bridge Company. Or, more likely, this is a bridge built in 1902 by the York Bridge Company. 1902 is the date given in the National Bridge Inventory.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.