This nine panel truss bridge closely follows one of the Wrought Iron Bridge Company's earliest Pratt truss designs, which as the plaque on the bridge mentions, was patented in 1876. The bridge itself was actually built in 1880. The bridge retains a large lattice railing with decorative motifs... a design the Wrought Iron Bridge Company used, but of which very few known examples remain.
The bridge is 130 feet long. Bridges this long are often taller than a "normal" single span pin-connected Pratt truss bridge and feature two main sway bracing beams instead of one. The taller trusses allow the bridge to handle the greater span distances. Sometimes the Pratt configuration is substituted with the Whipple configuration in addition to the truss height increase. However, the Hotel Bridge is not taller and is not a Whipple despite its longer length. Anyone who has visited a large number of pin-connected truss bridges may notice that the Hotel Bridge looks odd with its long length and standard height trusses.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.