This bridge was originally built for the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad. Pony truss bridges are uncommon on railroads, with through truss bridges and plate girders being far more common. As such, this bridge stands out as unusual, and even more so because it has two pony truss spans. With an 1899 construction date and pin connected trusses, the trusses are older examples among Michigan railroad truss bridges, and the pin connections speak to an earlier generation of railroad bridge design.
West of the pony truss spans are five steel deck plate girder approach spans totaling 130 feet in length. The two eastern spans are the largest of these, and the easternmost span is unusual because the girders come up to the track level, rather than completely hiding under the deck like a normal deck plate girder (and the other deck girder spans on this bridge). This easternmost span is also not symmetrical, with the eastern end's bottom chord sloping upward at the end. East of the central pony truss spans is a series of timber stringer approach spans totaling 150 feet in length. At the eastern end, the railroad splits to the north and south in a Y formation. The bridge appears to retain good historic integrity with no major alterations noted. The pony truss spans are outstanding examples of railroad pony truss bridge construction.
The reality that railroad pony truss bridges are far less common than highway pony truss bridges is quite striking. A potential reason for their limited use on railroads is detailed in The Principal Professional Papers of Dr. J. A. L. Waddell, Edited by John Lyle Harrington, dated 1905. The exact text from a discussion of railway bridges follows:
"The pony truss for railway bridges has happily fallen into oblivion. Its top chord was rarely well stayed and was often subjected to severe and unknown stresses, while the economy involved in its use was very small."
It would appear that the specific variety of stresses that a train puts on a railroad bridge were too great for the top chord of a pony truss. In contrast, a through truss with its extensive overhead bracing system must have provided the stability against these stresses.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.