The bridge's lightweight truss composition of angles and double-Warren configurations is reminiscent of a variety of trusses that were marketed in the early 20th Century as an alternative to heavier (and more expensive) trusses of more traditional design. An example is the Powers Highway Bridge. However, the bridge has some unique details that are unlike those bridges. First, the overall truss has an extreme camber, or curved shape to it, which is followed by the deck as well. This gives the bridge a somewhat arched shape. Also, the ends of the bridge feature a curved design, where the top chord smoothly transitions into a vertical end post. At the ends of the trusses, there is a section of plate with patterns of holes in it that form decorative flower-like shapes. Aside from the addition of an unsightly cyclone fence, this bridge appears to retain good integrity. It rests on stone abutments. It is not known when it was built, or who built it. It is however a rather unique bridge.
A historical photo of Loring Pond below is listed as an 1889 photo. It is difficult to see but a bridge that looks suspiciously like this one is visible. If so, this bridge dates to 1889 or earlier. Loring Park dates to 1883, so the bridge is probably not older than that. However even an 1889 construction date would be much older than expected for a bridge of this style.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2023, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.