This bridge follows a rare design that was used from roughly 1900 through 1915. It consists of a double-Warren truss configuration made with built-up rolled beams made of up extremely lightweight riveted angles, and vertical endposts made of channels. It is a very distinctive and unique design that is immediately recognizable as dissimilar from all other truss types. Compare this bridge to Michigan's Powers Highway Bridge. Sometimes these small trusses are called lattice trusses because the truss looks like a lattice, especially on a small truss like these bridges, however this naming is not recommended because it leads to confusion with the Warren Quadrangular (and similar) truss configurations which is the real lattice truss configuration. The bridge type was marketed as an inexpensive and simpler alternative to the larger and more traditional truss bridge types that are familiar to this period.
This bridge may have not been a bedstead. Vertical endposts do not mean that a truss is a bedstead. Bedstead truss bridges combine superstructure and substructure, since they have a vertical end post that extends below the bottom chord to act as a bridge support (substructure). Since the bridge has been relocated it is hard to tell if it once had bedstead legs or not. Other examples of this bridge type do not have legs.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.