View Information About HSR Ratings
This bridge is a traditionally composed example of a full-slope Pratt pony truss. The majority of one end post has been replaced. This represents the most significant alteration to the bridge. Minor alterations include the replacement of original railing.
The Historic Bridge Inventory states that Morrow County has a lot of surviving metal truss bridges because of a lack of available tax dollars. It should not take poverty to have an impressive collection of historic truss bridges. There is no reason why counties with more money should not have as many truss bridges either. If Morrow County does come across additional money in the future, it is hoped that will remember that it normally costs less to rehabilitate bridges like this rather than demolish and replace them.
During the site visit, HistoricBridges.org found that the bearings and lower portions of the end posts were buried in dirt and gravel. The simple task of taking a shovel, broom, hose, or combination of the three getting this dirt away from the metal of the bridge would be a simple task that could be carried out by county forces for little cost and would go a long way to preventing further deterioration of the bridge. While surface transportation funding and money is often limited, there really is no reason to not carry out such simple maintenance tasks that will nevertheless provide significant benefits for the bridge.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge InventorySetting/Context The bridge carries a 1 lane rural road over a stream in a rural area of active farms and scattered modern houses. Physical Description The 1 span, 63'-long, pin-connected Pratt pony truss bridge is supported on ashlar abutments that have been augmented with full-height concrete walls. The truss lines are traditionally composed with no innovative or distinctive details. Cover plate has been welded to some end posts Integrity Impact damage. Impacted rust to box section members. Summary of Significance The date of construction of the ca. 1892 pin connected Pratt pony truss bridge is not documented in Morrow County records, but stylistically it represents the standardization of design typical of ca. 1890 and
later bridges. It is one of 20 examples of the important bridge type in Morrow County with the oldest extant example dating to 1874. Many are undocumented and represent the era of standardization. Morrow County retains many
deteriorating pin connected truss bridges largely because of the economic issues associated with there replacement in a largely rural county with no industrial tax base. This example is not historically or technologically
significant. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No |
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) of this bridge.
Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of this bridge.
Additional Maps:
Google Streetview (If Available)
GeoHack (Additional Links and Coordinates)
Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)
Apple Maps (Apple devices only)
Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App
Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)
Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)
Directions Via Sygic For Android
Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser
USGS National Map (United States Only)
Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)
Historic Aerials (United States Only)
CalTopo Maps (United States Only)
© Copyright 2003-2024, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.