HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Cardington Denmark Martel Road Bridge North

Cardington Denmark Martel Road Bridge North

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

Bridge Documented: August 12, 2012

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Cardington Denmark Martel Road (CR-28) Over Shaw Creek
Location
Rural: Morrow County, Ohio: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1910 By Builder/Contractor: York Bridge Company of York, Pennsylvania

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
2000
Main Span Length
60 Feet (18 Meters)
Structure Length
62 Feet (19 Meters)
Roadway Width
15.4 Feet (4.69 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
5930448

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge is in general a rivet-connected Warren pony truss bridge. However it is extremely rare because, unlike nearly all rivet-connected truss bridges, the floorbeams are not riveted to the gusset plates. Instead, a pin is also present at the gusset plates, and this pin holds a u-bolt hanger that in turn holds the floorbeams. The use of u-bolt hung floorbeams was common with pin-connected truss bridges, where the pin was already present for the truss members and was also used for the floorbeam-holding u-bolt. However, with rivet-connected truss bridges, the floorbeams typically were simply riveted directly to the same gusset plate that held the truss members together. This combination of rivet-connected trusses with u-bolt hangers is extremely unusual. The only place this detail occurs with regularity is on a railroad line, originally a Baltimore and Ohio Line. Examples of these overpass bridges, apparently a design of the railroad, occur in both Ohio and Indiana. A good example is here. However, the York Bridge Company, which built this bridge in Morrow County, also appears to have constructed an unknown number of rivet-connected pony truss bridges with u-bolt hung floor beams. Another example was found in Maryland here. Although the exact details of the pin are different, since the pin in the Maryland example does not extend through the gusset plate like this Ohio, the two bridges both have u-bolt hangers.

Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge Inventory

Setting/Context

The bridge carries a 1 lane, rural road over a stream in a sparsely developed, rural setting. The road appears to be have a higher volume of traffic than many other rural roads.

Physical Description

The 1 span, 72'-long, rivet-connected Warren with verticals pony truss bridge is supported on stone abutments that may well predate the superstructure. While the truss lines are traditionally composed, the floorbeams are suspended with U-shaped suspenders rather than being framed into the lower panel point gusset plate. The suspenders are a 2000 in kind replacement. The plank deck is 15'-5" wide.

Integrity

Some holed section in lower chord battens.

Summary of Significance

The 1910 York Bridge Company riveted Warren with verticals pony truss bridge is historically and technologically significant because of the rare, transitional detail of pin connected floorbeams. It is one of eight examples in the state with the detail but the only one that is not railroad related. Any connection between this bridge and the B&O Railroad that placed the other bridges is not known at this writing. The Morrow County bridge is the only one documented to a fabricator. This is a rarely seen feature on otherwise riveted bridges. The connection is by means of a single suspender/hanger over a traditional pin, a detail that recalls earlier means of field connections. This suggests that the bridge design is transitional and that using the simple pinned connection expedited erection. Whatever informed the decision, the detail is uncommon and reflects experimental thinking the Warren pony truss bridge design. The detail is also seen on a series of 1904-07 B&O RR mainline overpasses in Ashland, Medina, Trumbull, and Portage counties.

Warren trusses are the most common truss design found in Ohio and the nation. The Ohio Phase 1A survey (2008) has identified more than 500 examples dating from 1897 (25XXXX1 and only 19th century example) to 1961, accounting for well over half of the approximately 800 pre-1961 metal trusses. The Warren design was particularly well suited to rigid (riveted, and later welded connections), but not as well suited to pin connections. This helps to explain its popularity in the 20th century rather than the 19th century, although it is based on a British patent issued to engineers James Warren and Willoughby Monzani in 1848. In the U.S., the popularity of the Warren truss coincided with improvements in pneumatic field riveting equipment starting about 1900. The Warren design, which is based on a series of equilateral triangles, is identified by its simplicity of design, ease of construction with equal-sized members, and ability of some diagonals to act in both tensions and compression. A bridge with riveted field connections is rigid and thus stronger than a pin connected bridge. It also better accommodates secondary stresses.

Warren trusses were a standard design of the Ohio State Highway Department in the 1910s and 1920s, but the design achieved greatest popularity with county engineers starting in the early 1900s. The counties purchased the bridges from Ohio fabricators such as the New Columbus Bridge Co., Champion Bridge Co. and the Mt. Vernon Bridge Co. Despite the popularity of the Warren truss bridge, fewer than 12 rivet-connected Warren trusses date prior to 1910 have been identified in Ohio, and they represent the period when the rivet-connected design solidified its position as the most popular prefabricated county truss design. The design was also popular with the railroads for the same reasons; it was efficient and economical.

Justification

The bridge has a rare construction detail that appears to be transitional from pinned to riveted field connections. The same floorbeam connection detail is used on a series of 7 B&O main line overpasses, but this example is the only one that is not railroad related. Its fabricator is documented.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes, High Significance

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Cardington Denmark Martel Road Bridge North

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Video
Northbound Crossing
Full Motion Video
Streaming video of the bridge. Also includes a higher quality downloadable video for greater clarity or offline viewing.

Divider

Maps and Links: Cardington Denmark Martel Road Bridge North

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
40.544430,-82.919371

View Bridge Location In:

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within a half mile of this bridge.

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles of this bridge.

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser

USGS National Map (United States Only)

Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)

CalTopo Maps (United States Only)


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider