This pony truss is noted for its uncommon use of lattice on its end posts instead of cover plate. It is also unusual for its rather primitive-looking pins that look like they were simple rods that were smashed with a hammer to install them, which may have been the case. However there are no nuts on them either. The pins may or may not be original. It is assumed the bridge's location on a private driveway is not its original location.
The bridge has unusual and very old-looking cast iron weight limit signs reading "Maximum Load Permitted 7 Tons By Order Co. Coms." The sign is old, but certainly isn't as old as the bridge. It is not known if the county provided this bridge to a private owner and added these signs, or if the signs were added while it was in service on a county road.
The ca. 1890 construction date suggested by the Historic Bridge Inventory seems to be on-target given the design of the bridge.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge Inventory
The bridge carries a 1 lane private drive over a stream in a wooded setting. The lane provides access to an active farm.
The 1 span, 63'-long, 5-panel, pin-connected Pratt pony truss bridge is supported on concrete abutments. It is composed of built-up upper chords of toe-out channels with coverplate and battens; end posts of toe-out channels with lacing and battens; verticals of toe-out channels with lacing; and diagonals and lower chords of eyebars. The floorbeams are suspended from the lower-chord pins by U-shaped hangers. The floorbeams carry timber stringers and plank deck. The members appear to be wrought iron based on visual inspection.
Summary of Significance
"The pin-connected Pratt pony truss is a complete, representative example of its type/design that is for the most part conventionally composed. It is dated ca. 1890 based on style of the end posts (no cover plates) and the material, which appears to be wrought iron not steel. It is among the earlier, complete surviving examples of its type/design and is technologically significant (Criterion C). Pratt trusses were undoubtedly the most popular truss design of the last quarter of the 19th century and continued to be built into the 20th century, although eventually superseded in popularity by Warren trusses. The design, which initially was a combination of wood compression and iron tension members, was patented in 1844 by Thomas & Caleb Pratt. Ohio has three covered bridges that use this combination configuration, but they are all modern reconstructions based on the Pratt patent. The great advantage of the Pratt over other designs was the relative ease of calculating the distribution of stresses. More significantly, it translated well into an all-metal design in lengths of less than 200'. Significant surviving examples of all-metal Pratt trusses mostly date to the last quarter of the 19th century, and they are found with thru, pony, and the less common bedstead configuration. Prior to about 1890, a variety of panel point connections were in widespread use (including bolts, cast-iron pieces, and pins), but engineering opinion was coalescing around pins as the most efficient and constructible. Many of the connection details were proprietary and associated with individual builders or companies, and thus earlier examples are generally taken to be technologically significant in showing the evolution of the design. Later post-1890 Pratt trusses show a progression toward less variation in their details such that by 1900 the design was quite formulaic with few significant differences between the designs of various builders. This marked the end of the pin-connected Pratt's technological evolution and, in fact, it was soon waning and eclipsed in the highway bridge market by more rigid, rivet-connected truss designs, particularly the Warren but also riveted Pratts. The transition to riveted connections, which happened even earlier with railroads than highways, was in no small part due to concerns about stress reversals at the pins under heavier loads and improvements in pneumatic field riveting equipment in the early 1900s. In Ohio, Pratt truss highway bridges, whether pinned or riveted, were almost always built under the auspices of counties and local units of government; the Pratt was not a standard design of the state highway department. In Ohio, there are 185 Pratt trusses dating from ca. 1874 to 1945 with at least 60 dating prior to 1900 (Phase 1A, 2008). The technologically significant unaltered examples of pin-connected Pratt trusses for the most part date prior to 1900 and have documented or attributed builders and dates of construction and/or significant connection or member details. Later post-1900 examples are less technologically significant. Significant unaltered examples of riveted-connected Pratt trusses date from ca. 1900 to 1915."
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
This bridge is on a private driveway.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.