This bridge was built in 1872 over Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek, and replaced and put into storage in 1966. It was relocated and restored here in 2017. The overhead bracing is not original and was added to the bridge when it moved here, which is why HistoricBridges.org lists this as a pony truss bridge. This is a very long pony truss span for a bowstring truss, which is likely why the overhead bracing was added for safety when the bridge was restored. The crossing includes a modern pre-stressed concrete adjacent box beam span. The preservation of this bridge is a great success story and shows how even if a bridge has to be stored for decades sometimes it can still result in preservation eventually. The bridge is a beautiful part of the county fairgrounds.
Above: Photo of bridge in original location, courtesy Troy Graft, Columbiana County Chief Engineer.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge Inventory (Prior to Relocation)
The bridge is in storage at the county garage.
The bridge is in a storage lot, so it has lost some aspects of integrity.
Summary of Significance
The ca. 1870 bowstring truss bridge, although currently in storage, maintains the integrity of its truss lines and thus its technological significance as a rare bridge type/design. It is known as the Lisbon Bridge, but its original location is not documented by the available information in the ODOT environmental review files. The bridge is attributed to the Massillon Bridge Co. based on the construction of its arched top chords and comparison with other documented examples. Bowstring trusses are characterized by arched top chords and a trussed or lattice web. They rank among the rarest and most technologically significant of 19th-century metal truss designs since they appeared early in the evolution of iron bridge development and were almost always based on the patents or proprietary designs of bridge builders and engineers. The progenitor of the form was the famed engineer Squire Whipple of New York, who built the first example in 1840 over the Erie Canal at Utica. After the Civil War, Ohio was a center for the development of the bowstring with its concentration of metal bridge-building companies. Companies such Wrought Iron Bridge, Champion Bridge, Massillon Bridge, and King Iron Bridge built their reputations on successful bowstring designs with a dizzying number of variant ways of forming and connecting the truss members. The companies emerged in time to fill the burgeoning demand for an economical, prefabricated bridge for use on American roads. Bowstring trusses thus document this exceptionally inventive and technologically significant period in the development of American metal trusses from the 1860s to early 1880s. The ODOT inventory has identified 22 surviving examples dating from ca. 1864 to 1880 (Phase 1A, 2008).
The bridge is one of the 22 extant bowstring truss bridges that survive in the state. Having so many is remarkable, and even though they are "common" based on their numbers, each is an important and irreplaceable record of the development of the metal truss bridge and the ingenuity associated with the Ohio industrial development. The bridge has high significance.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.