This bridge is one of the most spectacular historic bridges in southwestern Ohio. It is an eight panel pin connected Pratt through truss. It was built in 1887 by the Columbia Bridge Works, of Dayton Ohio. The bridge is noted for its outstanding historic integrity, in particular its retention of all ornamental elements including builder and commissioner plaques, as well as decorative finials. The bridge even sits on handsome stone abutments, which have a stone on top that has a date and engineer engraved into it. The bridge is also a noteworthy example of a bridge built by the Columbia Bridge Works. It stands out among bridges built by this company because the bridge is traditionally composed, with built-up beams containing v-lacing and battens, as well as traditional eyebars for diagonals and the bottom chord. Bridges built by Columbia Bridge Works usually are not traditionally composed and instead display unusual connection details, as well as an unusually heavy use of rolled beams instead of the built-up beams that were more common during that period. It is unknown why this bridge does not display the typical Columbia Bridge Works details. The ornamental features of this bridge are, in contrast, very much in line with typical Columbia Bridge Works design, from the finials that include the construction date at the base to the fancy arch-shaped builder plaque.
The only truss alteration noted on the bridge was minor, the replacement of a turnbuckle. The bridge's current deck is somewhat unusual, but attractive looking, a timber deck with red brick wearing surface.
The St. Clair Street Bridge has stood in the same place for well over a century and to this day continues to perform its original function. The good condition of the trusses demonstrates how long-lived the pin connected truss bridge could be if properly maintained, and suggests how much longer it can remain the crowning Eaton landmark for another century if Preble County chooses to continue to maintain it.
It is hoped that Preble County will indeed choose to preserve this historic bridge. Preble County, like much of the United States has shown an almost feverish obsession with preserving and promoting its wooden covered bridges. Historic metal truss bridges on the other hand have been neglected, demolished, and replaced. Only in a couple instances has Preble County shown a commitment to preserving its metal truss bridges. The time to increase the county's portfolio of preserved metal truss bridges is now (before it is too late), and this bridge should be among those preserved. Especially given that a short distance from this bridge crossing the same creek is a preserved covered bridge, to do anything other than preserve this bridge would only be a blatant continuation of the nationwide discrimination that metal truss bridges receive when compared to preservation of covered bridges. Further, this bridge is a great opportunity to try to draw attention to historic metal truss bridges. Even the many people who believe the only type of historic bridge is a covered bridge might take notice of this strikingly beautiful, well-ornamented historic metal truss bridge. Some people seem to think metal truss bridges are industrial looking or are utilitarian in appearance. Nothing could be further from the truth, when considering this particular bridge. This bridge is a great bridge to introduce people to the beauty of historic truss bridges.
The St. Clair Street Bridge is the only Preble County bridge that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. In contrast, every one of the wooden covered bridges extant in the county is on the National Register. Many of the county's metal truss bridges should be listed as well. Instead, many of Preble County's metal truss bridges instead are on the demolition list or have already been demolished, since HistoricBridges.org's 2006 documentation of the county.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge Inventory
The bridge carries a 2 lane street over a stream in a residential setting in Eaton. There is a park beyond one end of the bridge.
The 1-span, 108'-long, pin-connected Pratt thru truss bridge is traditionally composed of built-up compression members and eyebar tension members. It has decorative portal bracing with brackets, finials, and builders plaque. There are lattice railings. The bridge is supported on stone abutments.
Summary of Significance
The pin-connected Pratt thru truss bridge was fabricated by the Columbia Bridge Works, a prominent Ohio fabricator, in 1887. It is a classic example of its type/design. It is NR listed (1978).
The bridge is one of over 150 extant pin-connected truss bridges dating from 1874 for pony trusses and 1876 for thru trusses. Twenty six predate 1888 and represent the era of experimentation that evolved into standardized designs by about 1888. This example has moderate significance because the genre and the fabricator are so well represented in Ohio.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.