This is a bridge that, like a number of Toronto's many impressive bridges, is buried in the trees and nearly impossible to photograph even when the leaves are off the trees. Also like many bridges in Toronto, very little factual, verifiable information is available about the bridge, despite this being a bridge that undoubtedly has an interesting and colorful history. Span and total length given is a rough estimate.
The bridge seen today is best described as two parallel bridges that carry a single, unified deck. In 1929, a narrow two-lane deck truss bridge was built at this location. Later, a nearly identical (but much wider) truss was built right next to the 1929 bridge (on the east side) to enable a new, wider deck to be constructed, resulting in the wide six lane bridge seen today. Historical photos dated to 1960 by the City of Toronto Archives indicate that this widening occurred 1960. A modern plaque on the bridge with 1962 and 1994 date refers to the completion of the widening project and an unknown more recent project in 1994.
The 1929 (western) span is a mystery. It retains the general appearance of a 1929 truss, with built-up beams some of which include battens and v-lacing, just like one would expect. However, ALL fasteners are bolts, including not just connections but also built-up beams. This is a mystery. Rivets would have been used in 1929. Either every single rivet has been replaced, or the entire truss was replaced with a near-replica except that bolts were used. Either scenario would be equally bizarre. The 1960 span in contrast retains rivets for the built-up beams. The connections are bolted, however given the 1960 construction date, the connections may very well always have been bolted.
The 1929 span and the 1960 span are strikingly similar, however there are differences. The behavior of the bottom chord at the piers varies between the two, whether staying horizontal, sloping down, or sloping up. The 1960 span has trusses running closer to the abutment at the southern end, while the 1929 span has deck plate girders at this spot. A newer looking beam rests on top of the piers for the 1929 span which appears to suggest it was raised slightly, explaining the purpose of this beam.
A Wikipedia article claims that "Harold Babcock" was responsible for "building" the bridge in 1929. Assuming the association with Babcock is accurate, a more accurate description is that the engineering firm that Harold Babock was part of at the time called Margison and Babcock was the designer of the bridge. The on-site contractor is currently unknown.
An even older, low-level crossing of Bayview Avenue remains in place, albeit abandoned next to this bridge.
Above: A 1960 view on the original 1929 deck. Note the unusual railing.
Above: 1960 views showing the widening project in process.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.