HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Concession A Road Bridge

Concession A Road Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth and Rick McOmber

Bridge Documented: July 23, 2012

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Concession A Road Over Big Creek
Location
Rural: Norfolk County, Ontario: Canada
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
Not Available
Structure Length
Not Available
Roadway Width
Not Available
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
Not Applicable

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

This bridge is one of a small and decreasing number of surviving metal truss bridges in Norfolk County. Among the surviving bridges, this one is perhaps one of the least altered. There do not appear to be any alterations to the truss, including even minor alterations such as the replacement of rivets with bolts. Given the high level of historic integrity, this bridge would be a great recipient of an in-kind restoration. An in-kind restoration involves repairing the bridge in a manner that as much original material and design is retained as possible, and for elements beyond repair, they are replaced with exact replicas. In particular this would mean that failed rivets would be replaced with rivets, not with modern bolts as is commonly done. If floor beams were replaced, they would be replaced with the historically correct "American Standard Beam" style (which use sloped flanges) rather than modern wide flange beams. Despite the fact that this sounds expensive, in-kind restoration type repair is often comparable to a traditional rehabilitation. An in-kind restoration would bring this bridge to like-new condition. It would be able to support the weight it was originally designed for, which would enable it to serve at the very least light vehicular traffic, enabling this road to reopen to traffic.

A newspaper article listed the bridge as having a 1920 construction date. The 1920 date may not be exactly correct, but a ca. 1920 date might be accurate. Bridges of this style tend to date from 1905 to 1920, with a lot dating to ca. 1910-1915.

 

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Concession A Road Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

Divider

Maps and Links: Concession A Road Bridge

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
42.603420,-80.501030

View Bridge Location In:

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider