View Information About HSR Ratings
This bridge is not a highly significant bridge, but as a riveted through girder, is a representative example of what was long ago a popular type of railway bridge. Through girder bridges are still built on rail lines today, but they do not use rivets and have a much more plain and simple appearance. HistoricBridges.org photographed this bridge, visible from a non-motorized trail, on the way to photograph an extremely rare and highly significant riveted double-intersection Warren pony truss that was supposed to be on the trail. The trail and bridge were formerly part of Beechwood Drive. However, it was found that the rare truss bridge had demolished and replaced with an ugly MOB (Mail Order Bridge). It is unfathomable why a bridge that had high heritage significance and could likely have been easily rehabilitated to carry the light weight of pedestrian traffic was demolished and replaced. To do so was a huge waste of money and heritage. The bridge seen today is a typical MOB, ugly, and like every other one you have ever seen. Unremarkable in every way. A historical photo of this rare truss bridge is shown to the right.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
Additional Maps:
Google Streetview (If Available)
GeoHack (Additional Links and Coordinates)
Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)
Apple Maps (Apple devices only)
Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App
Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)
Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)
Directions Via Sygic For Android
Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser
© Copyright 2003-2024, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.