This iconic bridge is one of the most famous bridges in Oregon because of its incredible beauty and historic significance. It was designed by Robinson and Steinman. David Steinman was one of the most famous bridge engineers of the 20th Century and he specialized in design of suspension bridges.
The history of this bridge is well documented, so be sure to view the HAER documentation that tells the general history of the bridge. Because the bridge is well documented in other sources, the HistoricBridges.org narrative here is intended to focus on some features and history of the bridge that might be overlooked in the larger more comprehensive histories of the bridge.
When this bridge completed, this bridge had the longest span of any suspension bridge west of the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit. The concrete piers of the bridge are unusual for the period in which they were built because they contain solid steel frame reinforcement rather than just reinforcing rods (rebar) which was common during this period.
Wallace Bridge and Structural Steel Company was listed as the fabricator of the steel superstructure, and construction of the superstructure was shared by subsidiaries of U.S. Steel, U.S. Steel Products Company and Columbia Steel Company. The deck stringers were fabricated by Willamette Iron and Steel Works of Portland. J. H. Pomeroy Company erected the steel for the bridge.
Arguably one of the most beautiful bridges in the country, this bridge embodies the pinnacle of bridge aesthetics. Its beauty is solely derived from creating structural bridge elements that are themselves beautiful rather than adding superficial decorations to an ugly bridge structure. For example, the distinctive gothic arches in the piers and steel suspension towers of this bridge are attractive, but they also function as part of the actual structure and contribute to the strength and stability of the bridge. The concrete anchorages on this bridge are magnificent works of art... the only other anchorages that come to mind with a similar level of aesthetics are those for the Benjamin Franklin Bridge. The concrete foundations for the main suspension towers are also rather elaborate in architectural detailing.
The concept of making the actual bridge structure beautiful is rarely seen in modern bridge construction today, which has returned to the less sophisticated and less attractive concept of adding superficial decorations to bridge structures that are typically uglier than any bridge every built in the history of humanity. Moreover, adding these superficial decorations to modern bridges is only occasionally done and is given a special term called "context sensitive design" which is the polite way of saying "put pretty little decorations on our hideously ugly bridge." This modern practice only makes bridges like the St. Johns Bridge stand out as increasingly rare and significant.
David Steinman was known for suggesting the paint color that would look best on the bridges he designed. He did this for his Mackinac Bridge and also for the St. Johns Bridge. When the paint color of the bridge was being chosen, safety advocates wanted the tall bridge to be painted in stripes of bright yellow and black for airplanes. It is not known why anyone would suggest this given that lights on the towers is the traditional way of warning aircraft of tall structures. There is no record of any bridge in the United States being painted a particular color to warn airplanes. Fortunately, this idea was not selected for the St. Johns Bridge either, and David Steinman's suggestion of verde green to blend in with the trees was chosen. Steinman had a very sensible view on bridge paint color. He disliked the black and grey paint that was typical for bridges. He was quoted as saying he wanted "to get away from these sad, somber, cold colors and into something warm and bright to harmonize with and be apart of the landscape."
From a photography standpoint, these colors that Steinman advocated are also preferable because it makes the bridge easier to photograph in cloudy, dark weather, and also brings out the details and complexity that distinguish historic bridges from modern bridges.
Information and Findings From Oregon's Historic Bridge Inventory
1207-ft steel suspension main span with riveted steel deck truss approach spans for a total length of 3608-ft.
David B. Steinman and Holton D. Robinson
Gilpin Construction (Contractor), John A. Roebling's Sons Co. (Cable Design/Fabrication), Lindstrom and Feigenson (Contractor), Wallace Bridge and Structural Steel Company (Steel Fabricator)
As the largest and earliest of Oregon's three extant suspension bridges, the St. Johns Bridge is one of the most significant structures in the state. The designer, internationally-famous David B. Steinman, identified this bridge as his favorite among all those he built. Innovative for its time, it featured the highest concrete rigid frame piers in the world, the first use of main steel towers without diagonal bracing, and the use of prestressed rope strands instead of the conventional parallel wire cable construction. It also incorporated a number of decorative features, including its gothic arched details, large copper spires, a decorative steel railing and ornamentation on the concrete piers. The gothic arched details of this bridge may have influenced McCullough's later bridge designs.
Character Defining Features
Structure type, Location, Decorative details, Railing, Nameplate, Distinctive color
A significant rehabilitation was completed in 2005.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.