HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.
Historic Bridge Finder App: Find Nearby Bridges

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Babtist Church Road Bridge

Babtist Church Road Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Elaine Deutsch

Bridge Documented: October 10, 2011

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Babtist Church Road (TR-499) Over Pigeon Creek
Location
Rural: Chester County, Pennsylvania: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1916 By Builder/Contractor: John Parker Corcoran Construction Company of West Chester, Pennsylvania and Engineer/Design: Nathan R. Rambo

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
30 Feet (9.14 Meters)
Structure Length
35 Feet (10.67 Meters)
Roadway Width
20 Feet (6.1 Meters)
Spans
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
15701504990274

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge is one of a fair number of similar bridges in Chester County that are of unusual design. While not highly significant in terms of beauty or heritage value, they are unusual because they combine a traditional stone substructure with a cutting edge (for the period) reinforced concrete and steel superstructure. They appear to be confined to Chester County, having been designed by the county. The superstructure is a steel stringer bridge with a concrete deck. Stringers are encased in concrete using the jack-arch method, which was a method used briefly in the early 20th Century. The outside of the superstructure is also faced in concrete, which extends above the deck to hold the pipe railing system.

Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory

Discussion of Bridge

The single span, 35'-long encased steel stringer bridge built in 1916 by the county has twohigh rail pipe railings, stone abutments, and stone wingwalls with parapets. The concrete encasement is spalled and cracked. Concrete encasement was favored in the state because it provided protection for the steel and eliminated the need to periodically paint the beams. A representative example of one of the most common, 20th-century bridge types and designs in the state, it has no innovative or distinguishing details. It is one of at least 630

Discussion of Surrounding Area

The bridge carries a 2 lane road over a stream in a rural area of active farms and scattered 19th- to late-20th-century residences. At the bridge's northeast quadrant is a row of ranch and Colonial-Revival-style residences (ca. 1960). At the northwest quadrant is a field and modern dairy shed. To the southeast quadrant is a field and about 300' beyond a late-19thcentury farmhouse. The setting does not have the cohesiveness or integrity of a potential historic district.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Babtist Church Road Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2019, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider