This attractive state standard riveted through truss bridge was lucky enough in 2003-2004 to receive a repainting. The new paint color is a deep, yet vibrant blue color that really helps this bridge's beautiful details stand out. Sometimes a bridge might be painted a more dull color to help it blend in with its surroundings. However it is nice to see a brighter colors used as well, since historic bridges deserve to be noticeable, and a vibrant paint color can help a bridge be noticed. The bridge has cantilevered sidewalks on each side which have a riveted lattice railing with elongated lattice design that is not like the standard found on most state standard truss bridges. The bridge has no significant alterations and thus its historic integrity is good.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The 1936, riveted, single span, 221'-long, Parker thru truss bridge is supported on concrete abutments with flared, stepped wingwalls. Built to a state highway department standard design, the bridge is an example of a common technology with no innovative or distinctive details. It was part of the rebuilding efforts following the devastating 1936 St. Patrick's Day flood. Over 275 bridges, mostly in the western and central portions of Pennsylvania, were destroyed or damaged beyond repair. To replace them the department turned to established technologies like riveted metal truss bridges, which had been used in the state since about 1900. The bridge is neither historically nor technologically significant.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The bridge carries a 2 lane street over a stream on the south edge of Meadville, southeast of the National Register-listed Meadville Downtown Historic District. The bridge is separated from it by an area dominated by post-WW II commercial and industrial development along SR 19. To the north are a parking lot and a 1960s office building. To the south is a neighborhood of undistinguished, predominantly early 20th century houses with scattered commercial buildings. Most houses have modern siding and altered windows. The area adjacent to the bridge does not have historic district potential.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.