This bridge is an outstanding example of why Pittsburgh created an Art Commission that reviewed and adjusted bridge designs prior to approving construction. The intent of the commission was to avoid the construction of a bridge that looks like this! The ugliest bridge over a river in downtown Pittsburgh, this bridge is only included here for continuity of people wishing to tour the famous downtown Pittsburgh bridges. Unlike the Birmingham Bridge, which at least is a structure of notable type, a steel arch bridge, and thus worthy of a few photos, this bridge is not even worthy of HistoricBridges.org camera equipment, thus a Wikipedia photo appears here. Its massive girders block the view of more beautiful bridges in the city. As rare as this would be, it should be demolished and replaced with a modern bridge that at least harmonizes with the monumental/signature nature of every single other river bridge in downtown Pittsburgh. America is not known for designing attractive modern bridges, so it may make sense to seek out a European or Asian engineering firm to produce a modern bridge that is something other than the typical eyesores designed by the city's favorite consulting engineer, Michael Baker. Certainly a signature landmark bridge would be a better way of honoring the sacrifice of America's veterans than this bridge, which is more of an insult.
There is no photo gallery for this modern, non-historic bridge.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.