This bridge is a uniquely attractive example of a concrete arch bridge. The bridge's arch span crosses the Root River, but also has an approach span over an adjacent Horlick Drive. The concrete of the bridge is carefully detailed for aesthetic purposes. Among these features are the stepped design of the railings whose outer face blends seamlessly in with the arch superstructure. The arch columns have a repeating arch design under the bridge deck, and at the top of the outer portions of the columns, there is a decorative design. In between each of the columns along the span, the concrete at the outer base of the deck had a subtle arch shape between each column. Unlike many open spandrel arch bridges, this one has a solid barrel as opposed to a ribbed design. Perhaps the most striking feature of the bridge is the colorful sculptures set into the concrete. These are complimented by decorative color tile mosaics on the bridge railing interiors.
This bridge was designed by Charles S. Whitney. Whitney was a noted engineer in southeastern Wisconsin operating a firm in Milwaukee, and a number of unique concrete bridges were designed by him, this bridge being one such example. Whitney later got together with with famous bridge engineer Othmar H. Ammann (noted for the design of several large bridges in New York City), forming the firm Ammann & Whitney. Ammann & Whitney remains in business today. More information is available here.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.