This bridge is a rare example of a style of lightweight bridge that is composed of rolled angles forming a Double-Warren pony truss bridge with vertical end posts. This lightweight style of bridge is rare, yet other examples can (or could at one time) be found with the same general composition in terms of lightweight members and Double-Warren truss design. They may have been a low-cost alternative to heavier and more traditional truss bridge types. This bridge has the additional unusual detail (which is not shared by all examples of this style of truss bridge) of having its endposts extend below the lower chord of the bridge making this bridge a rare example of a bedstead truss bridge. However, the historic significance is not notable in this case, because it appears the endposts on this bridge are modern replacements. This bridge might have been moved to this location, or significantly altered in this location. In either case, it may have not been a bedstead truss originally, and the portions of the bridge which make this bridge a bedstead are modern. Many welds can be seen on the rolled end posts/legs, and modern steel CSC brands were noted on this steel, indicative of non-original steel.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.