HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:

We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Grantsville Bridge

Grantsville Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth and Rick McOmber

Bridge Documented: July 1, 2006

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
US-40 Alt Over Casselman River
Grantsville: Garrett County, Maryland: United States
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1932 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Main Span Length
133 Feet (40.54 Meters)
Structure Length
137 Feet (41.76 Meters)
Roadway Width
40 Feet (12.19 Meters)
1 Main Span(s)
NBI Number

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

View The Historic Bridge Inventory Report For This Bridge

This bridge is a beautiful historic companion to the even older and more significant Casselman Bridge. Indeed the views of the Grantsville Bridge from the Casselman Bridge are spectacular, with the ugly, modern I-68 Bridge being the only scar on an otherwise pristine calendar-photo-quality landscape of historic bridge and mountains.

The truss bridge is an excellent representation of the standard plan design that Maryland employed for truss bridges in the 1930s. During the first half of the 20th century, states designed standard plans for bridges. It is often interesting to compare the designs that each state created for their truss bridges. Maryland's design appears to feature a wider deck than other states employed, unless this bridge was originally designed to accommodate more lanes of traffic than the two it holds today. Wide shoulders are present on the bridge.  The Maryland design features extensive use of rolled beams as opposed to built-up members, giving the structure a more plain appearance than similar bridges in other states. Only the chords and some parts of the sway bracing are built-up. V-lacing occurs on the sway bracing beams, while lattice is on the underside of the top chord and end post box beams. The bottom chord sections are connected via battens. The Grantsville Bridge is also a skewed example of the design. Pole railings appear to be the original railings that remain on the bridge, while modern Armco style railings appear below those.

The bridge is listed as having a poor superstructure and serious deck condition according to National Bridge Inventory inspections. This condition shows the bridge is in need of restoration, but is not so far gone that it cannot be restored or rehabilitated for continued vehicular use. This bridge is locally significant as the last truss bridge remaining in the county, at least on public highways. There was apparently a pin-connected truss bridge near this bridge on River Road, but that apparently does not exist anymore. Given this fact, as well as the fact that the bridge is plenty wide for a modern highway, the preservation of this bridge for continued vehicular use in place seems a worthy cause.

This bridge is listed on Maryland's Historical Trust website as a state-identified historic place.


Photo Galleries and Videos: Grantsville Bridge

View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original Size photos and Mobile Optimized photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

View Maps
and Links

Home Top


About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.