This bridge is a great example of why railings are important with historic bridges. If this bridge were to have modern Armco railings or New Jersey barrier instead of the ornamental railings which were the standard bridge bridges from the 1930s-1960s, this bridge would be nothing more than a slab of concrete. Indeed, without the railings, this bridge would look like a bridge that might be built in the 21st century, a simple slab with no design with beauty whatsoever. But with the railings, this bridge takes on an attractive appearance. Perhaps not as much as a curved t-beam or a deck truss, but still, the railings make the bridge look like someone wanted the bridge to be attractive in addition to functional. As it stands, this bridge retains good historic integrity. Pre-stressed concrete was not commonly used in the early 1960s, so this might also be noteworthy as an early example of that technology, as bland as it may look. Also, this structure has a significant skew to it, and is also a fairly long bridge for Michigan, at four spans and 220 feet.
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original Size photos and Mobile Optimized photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
This historic bridge has been demolished. This map is shown for reference purposes only.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.